Solar Lanterns
But, the price has to come down by may be a factor for it to become ubiquitous. Let's see how it all evolves.
Labels: thoughts
my reflections/thoughts about myself, friends, family and the environment i live in, meant mainly for my own purposes (curious to keep track of how my thoughts/opinions evolve, yeah! i believe in change of opinions). If you find some of my logic/reasons flawed please do drop a comment explaining the flaw.
Labels: thoughts
Labels: thoughts
| Declared reserves with suspicious increases in bold purple (in billions of barrels) from Colin Campbell, SunWorld, 80'-95 | |||||||
| Year | Abu Dhabi | Dubai | Iran | Iraq | Kuwait | Saudi Arabia | Venezuela |
| 1980 | 28.00 | 1.40 | 58.00 | 31.00 | 65.40 | 163.35 | 17.87 |
| 1981 | 29.00 | 1.40 | 57.50 | 30.00 | 65.90 | 165.00 | 17.95 |
| 1982 | 30.60 | 1.27 | 57.00 | 29.70 | 64.48 | 164.60 | 20.30 |
| 1983 | 30.51 | 1.44 | 55.31 | 41.00 | 64.23 | 162.40 | 21.50 |
| 1984 | 30.40 | 1.44 | 51.00 | 43.00 | 63.90 | 166.00 | 24.85 |
| 1985 | 30.50 | 1.44 | 48.50 | 44.50 | 90.00 | 169.00 | 25.85 |
| 1986 | 31.00 | 1.40 | 47.88 | 44.11 | 89.77 | 168.80 | 25.59 |
| 1987 | 31.00 | 1.35 | 48.80 | 47.10 | 91.92 | 166.57 | 25.00 |
| 1988 | 92.21 | 4.00 | 92.85 | 100.00 | 91.92 | 166.98 | 56.30 |
| 1989 | 92.20 | 4.00 | 92.85 | 100.00 | 91.92 | 169.97 | 58.08 |
| 1990 | 92.20 | 4.00 | 93.00 | 100.00 | 95.00 | 258.00 | 59.00 |
| 1991 | 92.20 | 4.00 | 93.00 | 100.00 | 94.00 | 258.00 | 59.00 |
| 1992 | 92.20 | 4.00 | 93.00 | 100.00 | 94.00 | 258.00 | 62.70 |
| 2004 | 92.20 | 4.00 | 132.00 | 115.00 | 99.00 | 259.00 | 78.00 |
Labels: thoughts
'Retail Chains, Reliance Retail, WalMart ..' we have been hearing of these names but never thought more about them. Most of us just know that all it is to do is setting up big air-conditioned shops and selling goods which amy also be sold by our nukkad shop (mom and pop stores). The next thing coming to mind may be that it is going to ruin the small-time traders and benefit on the big corporates like Mukesh Ambani.
I have been following the retail scene in India very closely since 2004, mainly because of personal interest. In this post I would like to present the real picture of this retail thing and what it means to India in layman's terms. The article tries to show a glimpse of what all goes on in the back-end of these retail chains (mainly hyper markets) in very simple terms.
Types of Retail Chains
These retail chains setup big, flashy, air-conditioned shops where you can touch, feel and then buy items. Now, there are several formats to it. Different formats are created mainly to cater to different segments. For example
The purpose of the post is to try and find out the real reasons and circumstances which led to the Independence of India in 1947. Many would attribute it to the efforts of Indian National Congress under the leadership of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. But, in my opinion, the theory lacks supports in historical documents except those school textbooks (prepared by congress itself over the years). Feel free to comment and provide citations/sources for more information on the topic
Some facts:Pre-Independence Congress had attained its height of popularity during 1935-1945. During the 1937 elections, it won 711 out of total of 1585 seats (less than 45%), rest went to muslim league and regional parties.
Congress split over the support to Britain in WWII in 1939. Subhash Chandra Bose had to move out even after winning the presidential election in Tripuri Session in 1939.
Quit India Movement was announced on 8 August 1942 by M K Gandhi after the failure of Cripps Mission. But, before the dawn of 9 Aug 1942 all the major leaders of Congress were under arrest including Gandhi. Infact, a relatively unknown Aruna Asaf Ali had to preside over the AICC session on 9th August. The movement is supposed to be over by March 1943. Even the then congress considered it a failure. Gandhji was released in 1944 on account of his failing health. He underwent lot of personal losses during this time. His wife Kasturba as well as his secretary Mahadev Desai died during this period.
In July 1943 Subhash Chandra Bose assumed the leadership of Indian National Army.
On 18 April 1944 INA broke into Moirang in Manipur. Following that INA breached the Kohima Road and penetrated around 250 miles inside the Indian Territory. But, the supplies from Japan failed them and British troops overthrew them again.
Though the Azad Hind Movement died prematurely, the trials of INA troops in 1945 inflamed the masses in general. Such, was the effect that British government forbid the BBC from broadcasting their story. During and after the trial, mutinies broke out in the British Indian Armed forces, most notably in the Royal Indian Navy which found public support throughout India, from Karachi to Bombay and from Vizag to Calcutta and ultimately came to involve 78 ships, 20 shore establishments and 20,000 sailors.
After the WWII ended in 1945 the financial condition of Britain was in shambles.
By 1945 British economic interests in India were considerably less than they had been. In 1900 British goods represented 69 percent of Indian imports but in 1945 the figure was less than 20 percent. In 1870 India had sent 53 percent of its exports to Britain while in 1945 only 28 percent of its exports were. Although still of some importance to the British economy India did not play as important role as, for example, Malaya which was a dollar-earner useful in the support of sterling. During the inter-war depression the value of exports to India had fallen by half, foreign penetration and import substitution contributing to the decline. On balance it was no longer worth the cost of attempting to further delay the granting of independence—better to pull out as gracefully as possible and try and maintain links with a new leadership which still had some sympathy and respect for things BritishSource.
Also, running the day to day administration of a colony like India was a big burden given that trade could be carried out even after granting the political independence.
INC between 1943-1946
****
1943-44 Allied victories in the war leading to intransigent British position
1943-44 Gandhiji and Congress leaders released from Prison but British refuse to negotiate
1943-44 Jinnah adamant on Partition
1945 Simla Conference fails
1946 INA Trial
1946 Naval Mutiny
1946 Cabinet Mission to decide fate of India
1946 Congress wins an overwhelming majority in Elections to the Constitutional Assembly
****
No major efforts towards the achievement of freedom are visible from INC's side.
Dhanjaya Bhat, writing in The Tribune
An extract from a letter written by P.V. Chuckraborty, former Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court, on March 30 1976, reads thus:
When I was acting as Governor of West Bengal in 1956, Lord Clement Attlee, who as the British Prime Minister in post war years was responsible for India’s freedom, visited India and stayed in Raj Bhavan Calcutta for two days. I put it straight to him like this: ‘The Quit India Movement of Gandhi practically died out long before 1947 and there was nothing in the Indian situation at that time which made it necessary for the British to leave India in a hurry. Why then did they do so?’ In reply Attlee cited several reasons, the most important of which were the INA activities of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose, which weakened the very foundation of the British Empire in India, and the RIN Mutiny which made the British realise that the Indian armed forces could no longer be trusted to prop up the British. When asked about the extent to which the British decision to quit India was influenced by Mahatma Gandhi’s 1942 movement, Attlee’s lips widened in smile of disdain and he uttered, slowly, ‘Minimal’.
Labels: thoughts
Labels: thoughts
Labels: thoughts
In the last decade India has made big strides in the global economy especially IT and BPO sectors. There have been numurous stories about the jobs moving from everywhere to India. Optimism is probably at its highest level among the urban Indian youth. Most of them are either earning more than their parents ever did or are sure of doing so after finishing their college.
But, I have always been skeptical if all this can really elevate India, the real India, the rural India. All these stories are mainly of nri's and urban indians. All this has barely made any dent in the rural regions of the country. The only sign of modernity you will find is television sets and mobile. Green Revolution was the only thing which had some real impact on the life of rural Indians, but that too was limited to just punjab, haryana and to some extent western UP. Also, It is now a age old story (the time-period of green revolution was 1967-1978). It is close to three decades since any serious step has been taken in that direction. Infact, rural India is still where it was decades ago.
I have always been of the view that agriculture will have to move-up a step to bring out Indians from the clutches of poverty. It requires fewer people to be involved and be made more profits. Talking about profits, it will enormously help if middlemen can somehow be removed and reduced by a large extent. the crux of the problem is lack of proper supply chain management. With Mukesh Ambani deciding to enter the retail market (read Bigger, Faster, Better), with his bigger than the biggest dreams it seems that the retail business in India is on the verge of a revolution as had been the case with telecom with reliance infcomm entering the foray three years back. In the field of petrochemicals/refinery Mukesh has shown the world that he has the capacity and tenacity to turaround a country like India's position to a 'net energy exporter'. When Mukesh entered the telecom sector, the mobile market was restricted mainly to the upper and upper-middle class and that too exclusively in urban areas. The current scenario needs no story-telling, everyone knows about the booming telecom sector.
Mukesh plans to invest $5 billion by 2011. The investment will be distributed across the whole chain, the farms, the stores and the distribution system guided by the latest logistics technology. He aims to create enough of a surplus to generate $20 billion in agricultural exports annually. His trials are already complete in partnership with the Sahakari Bhandar chain of 19 supermarkets in Mumbai. The stores were modernized and new system put in place resulting in trippling of revenues in a matter of two months. During the second phase, he plans to enter the small towns with a population of over 50,000 and build stores/partner with already existing stores before entering the metros.
But the biggesy risk is from the lack of infrastructure and modern technologies in the farm sector. "To transform Indian farmers into quality suppliers for his new retail chain, Ambani plans to create 1,600 farm-supply hubs across India, providing technical know-how and credit, selling seeds, fertilizer and fuel, and buying produce. He also plans to build some 85 logistics centers to move food to retail outlets and to ports and airports for export. Reliance is gearing up to train tens of thousands of new employees in the next six to eight months to do everything from erecting prefab warehouses to transporting fresh produce."
If all this goes well and according to plans, rural India will find itself catapulted into a era of self-perpetutating growth. It has the potential to do the same for the farmers what IT/BPO has done for the college grads.
July 17, 2006 issue - Mukesh Ambani has been India's Mr. Big for a long time. By all accounts, he is the country's most influential private citizen, and the businessman who thinks bigger than the rest in this rising economic superpower. He was all that even before a bitter internal feud led to a split in his family conglomerate. The breakup, finalized in January, left Mukesh in control of the larger (and largely petrochemical) share, Reliance Industries, and that behemoth has seen its fortunes soar ever since. It is now India's largest private-sector enterprise by any measure: revenue ($20 billion in 2005), profit ($2 billion), or share of Indian GDP (3.5 percent). Last week its stock closed up 15 percent since January, making Reliance India's biggest company by market cap (about $35 billion). Mukesh, who was already the world's 38th richest person before the split, according to Forbes, is now considerably richer. He says that while most family empires destroy wealth when they divide, the parting of the Ambanis was a "win-win" proposition.
Now, Mr. Big's ambitions are bigger than ever. Since the breakup, Ambani, 49, has finalized plans to invest more than $11 billion over the next decade to build two new satellite cities outside creaking, overcrowded Mumbai and Delhi. He foresees these metropolises emerging within just four years, each with a population of 5 million people making $5,000 a year, on average (or seven times India's norm), and hosting top multinational companies. And that is all pretty simple—a development on steroids—compared with the idea that really gets Ambani going.
Ambani's favorite scheme aims to revolutionize in one swoop two of India's largest but most backward sectors: farming and retail. Despite boom times, India is still a nation where 100 million mostly small farmers work with ox and plow, where 96 percent of retail stores are mom-and-pop shops and most of the roads between farm and store are mud tracks. Ambani plans to invest $5 billion by 2011 to put both the farms and the stores on the road to modernity, connect them through a distribution system guided by the latest logistics technology, and create enough of a surplus to generate $20 billion in agricultural exports annually.
In China, these plans would be hatched by the Communist Party. In India, the government is neither visionary nor efficient enough. But Mukesh Ambani is both. "This new business model excites me the most," said Ambani, wearing a white polyester-blend, safari-style shirt and dark blue slacks, in an exclusive interview in his Mumbai office recently.
Ambani is in many ways the enthusiastic extreme in a booming India, which has seen an explosion of entrepreneurial energy every time it opens a new industry to competition. The Reliance conglomerate got its start as a family textile business in 1966, and has grown in spurts, often triggered when the government released its grip on one sector or another. Mukesh Ambani's new cities were born, for example, from a recent reversal in the attitude of both state and federal governments, which are now willing to give private businessmen control over huge projects. "Can you imagine the change in mind-set?" he says. "The government is ceding its powers."
Reliance has always had a complex relationship with the government. In a sea of family monopolies, it was a genuine start-up. Yet it quickly acquired deep and sometimes murky connections with politicians, who have often helped Reliance along the way. Mukesh retains the extraordinary clout of his late father, Dhirubhai, the company's founder. But many who have dealt with him say he has also created a company that succeeds based on merit, not political good will. In that sense India's complex and controlled reform process has been perfect for market-savvy insiders like Ambani.
Ambani is not the only major Indian entrepreneur who sees India's farmers as an army of opportunity, either. Others are investing heavily in fruit and vegetable exports to Europe, information services for farmers, and consumer credit in the countryside. What unites them is both pursuit of profit, and a perhaps uniquely Indian mission to spread the wealth, which is arguably becoming a business necessity in a democracy whose growing income gap could prove explosive, particularly for the superrich. What distinguishes Ambani is the sweep of his plans, and a track record for making big projects happen. "His genius, his strength, is that he's enormously good at executing large projects," says Nandan Nilekani, the CEO of Infosys, India's huge IT company. "He is able to assemble large numbers of people, the project-management skills, the capital and then execute."
Ambani wants to build a chain of both small and supersize stores across India, creating 1 million jobs and reaching $25 billion in annual sales, all by 2011. If his plan succeeds, he says, consumers will get fresher food at lower prices, rural incomes will soar, farmers will become active consumers, and Reliance will become "a WalMart in India." The agricultural export boom will bring India's farmers into the global economy, as IT has done for its college grads. "We are rebalancing the world," says Ambani. "We are in fact lucky to be at the right place at the right time, contributing to our self-confidence as Indians. That's what energizes me." It's a vision in which everyone wins, which helps explain the silence of any doubters.
They were not so silent earlier. Mukesh Ambani got his start implementing his father's dreams. In 1980 Dhirubhai summoned Mukesh back from his M.B.A. studies at Stanford to begin a risky attempt at "backward integration" of its textile mills. The plan was to move from sewing clothes to creating the fabric, and eventually refining and pumping the oil from which synthetic fabrics are made.
At almost every step, naysayers would dismiss Ambani's plans as too grand for the Indian market. Mukesh first took charge of building a polyester plant at Patalganga, with an annual capacity of 10,000 tons at a time when India's demand was only 6,000 tons, and got it done in just 18 months. After Dhirubhai was hobbled by a stroke in 1986, Mukesh became a more nearly equal partner and was once again manager-in-chief when Reliance built a petrochemical plant to feed the Patalganga complex. "The son learned at his father's feet how to think big," says Vallabh Bhanshali, a Mumbai investment banker.
By 1996, the Ambanis were launching the next step in their grand plan: an oil refinery. Mukesh lived in a shipping container at the arid site in Jamnagar, 850 kilometers northwest of Mumbai on the Gulf of Kutch, while managing a work force of 80,000 and shuttling back to Mumbai in a small plane to consult with his invalid father and answer the critics, who kept asking: "What does Reliance know about refining?"
The Jamnagar project would set the pattern of sharp attention to detail, executed at breakneck speed, for which Ambani is now famous. He and his experts looked at 2,400 configurations for the refinery, sweated over every detail, yet finished in just three years. Jamnagar is now the world's third-largest refinery, and can turn crude into gas for cars or aviation fuel for $2 or $3 less per barrel than its closest Asian rival, a plant in Singapore. "We wanted and got an elephant that could dance to the tune of any market," says Hital Meswani, a long-time family friend who heads the refining operation.
Soon after the plant came online in 2000, India not only stopped importing refined oil products, it started exporting enough to more than pay for its crude-oil imports, becoming a net energy exporter for the first time. While other nations like Angola and Turkmenistan have achieved a similar turnaround, they did it by simply exploiting existing oil reserves—not by creating an industry from nothing, as Ambani did for India.
Soon, Ambani plans to break ground on a $6 billion expansion that will make Jamnagar the world's largest refinery, capable of processing more than 60 million tons of crude oil annually. Meanwhile, he has completed the "backward integration" of Reliance through an oil and gas exploration company that has hit a potentially huge natural gas reserve off the east coast of India, and is now spending $1 billion annually to pursue sites too remote for major oil companies, including three in Iraqi Kurdistan. "Mukesh wants to take risks," says P.M.S. Prasad, president of the search company, Reliance Petroleum.
Dhirubhai did not live to see this moment. He died in 2002, setting off a power struggle between Mukesh and his younger, more flamboyant brother, Anil, 47, that became a tabloid sensation and prompted speculation that Reliance itself might not survive. Mukesh pushed ahead during this period, taking advantage of the deregulation of the telecom sector to launch Reliance Infocomm in 2003, which quickly became the third-largest telecom in India. Mukesh felt a special attachment to Infocomm because it realized another dream of his father's—cutting the price of a phone call down to a penny a minute in India.
A year ago, with Reliance stock faltering, the matriarch of the Ambani clan stepped in to resolve the feud by dividing the conglomerate in two: the majority share ended up in Mukesh's hands, but Anil got Reliance Infocomm as well as Reliance Energy (electric power) and Reliance Capital (finance). "We are not crying about the three sectors we lost," says Anand Jain, Ambani's friend from their grammar-school days and head of Reliance's new cities project. Jain points out that within one month of the settlement Mukesh was rolling out three new projects, including the new cities, the farm-to-retail plan, and a related plan to foment "a second green revolution" in biofuels.
The Indian market is smiling on all of Mukesh's schemes. The three companies under his control have more than $22 billion in annual revenue, but 90 percent of that comes from Reliance Industries, which is entirely in petrochemicals. No doubt high oil prices have helped push up Reliance's stock price in recent months, says Ambarish Baliga, a vice president at Karvy Stock Broking in Mumbai. "But Reliance's strength is Mukesh" and the consensus view is that Reliance Industries will thrive even if oil prices fall because retail is "the main story going forward."
The question that some Indian businessmen ask, in private, is whether Ambani can really translate the model he used to build refineries so successfully to all his new projects. While Reliance touts its new business teams as top-flight, many old family friends remain in the upper ranks.
They are, however, as meticulous as ever. The farm-to-retail team is researching every step of the plan, from vegetable growing to hypermarket versus mom-and-pop retailing. The good news is that the backwardness of Indian farming conceals competitive advantages—for example, India has more arable land than any other country, and spans climate zones ranging from alpine to tropical that can grow any cash crop. The bad news, says Ambani, is that "the whole supply chain is totally disorganized." Because of a lack of storage, refrigeration and transportation, some 40 percent of India's fruit and vegetables spoils before reaching market.
To transform Indian farmers into quality suppliers for his new retail chain, Ambani plans to create 1,600 farm-supply hubs across India, providing technical know-how and credit, selling seeds, fertilizer and fuel, and buying produce. He also plans to build some 85 logistics centers to move food to retail outlets and to ports and airports for export. Reliance is gearing up to train tens of thousands of new employees in the next six to eight months to do everything from erecting prefab warehouses to transporting fresh produce. Even Reliance's admirers note that with little experience in farming or retail, Ambani is taking his biggest risks yet. "There will be mistakes," Ambani admits. "But we are not scared. We will correct our mistakes fast and move on."
In a sense, Ambani's basic bet is on the future of the Indian market and its 1 billion consumers. This is virgin territory, in which the 96 percent share held by 12 million family-run shops is high even compared with China (80 percent) or Thailand (60 percent). That makes it a relatively easy market to conquer. In the past two years Reliance has built 1,250 modern service stations, and already has 15 percent of the retail gas market, with plans to double the number of Reliance stations by December. Mukesh predicts consumer sales will surpass refining as Reliance Industries' main source of revenue within seven years.
Ambani thinks he can beat the likes of Wal-Mart on his home turf based in part on local knowledge: for example, Reliance executives understand that small retailers are a powerful lobby, particularly on the local level, and could easily trip up a giant. So Ambani is moving first to incorporate small stores into his chain, starting with a trial partnership with the Sahakari Bhandar chain of 19 supermarkets in Mumbai. In just two months, Reliance has renovated, computerized and stocked these stores, with dramatic results: average store revenue and customer traffic have tripled. In a second stage, Ambani plans to build new superstores, starting on the outskirts of the 784 Indian towns with populations greater than 50,000 before expanding into the ten largest cities, where property prices and congestion make superstores problematic.
Ambani's farm, retail and energy visions merge at his Life Sciences Center in Mumbai, which is pursuing his "second green revolution." Founded in 2002, its research includes experiments in growing biofuels from the jatropha plant and cellulose on a commercial scale. "If you can crack the cellulose code just like the Da Vinci code, cellulose and jatropha could give us two agro-routes to a world without gasoline," he says. About half of Indian homes have no electricity, and Ambani says big companies have no workable plan to bring it to them (an indirect slap at Anil's Reliance Energy). His answer is to go "wireless." He now has teams setting up experimental biomass generators in remote villages, and envisions a day when thousands of villages have these generators—sold and serviced by Reliance's rural retail network.
It could happen, as many obstacles seem to be melting in Ambani's path. Last year Parliament passed a law creating Special Economic Zones, which grant developers authority to plan new projects with more freedom than even China allows in its own bustling SEZs, on which Ambani's new cities are modeled. Reliance has all but secured 150 square kilometers of largely farm land east of Mumbai, at prices Jain estimates at 1/1000th those in downtown Mumbai. The government holds some equity in the projects, but as a largely "silent" partner, and has already approved Reliance's detailed plans for both new cities, says Ambani. "If you would have asked me five years ago if a project like this was possible I would have said no."
Reliance's first move will be to set up roads, rapid transit, power and water supply, telecom and rail links. In cooperation with the government it plans to build a 20-kilometer bridge across the bay linking old and new Mumbai, and a new seaport. Another private firm is building a new airport nearby. There will be a one-stop licensing agency, jointly run by Reliance and the government, to cut through India's infamous red tape. "Every serious investor in the world is approaching us to get in," boasts Jain, and Reliance has already secured $2 billion. Ambani expects that the cities will each pump $25 billion into the national economy every year. With groundbreaking due to begin later this year, Reliance aims to finish New Mumbai and Delhi by 2010 or sooner. "If anyone can do it Reliance can," says Sanjay Nayar, the CEO of Citigroup in India. After all, the bigger and faster, the better.
Alot of changes have been going on in the country on the economic front over the last decade, but I was never so much hopeful as I am today. It is all because of the way events have been unfolding and the upbeat mood. Will first quote some of the articles that convey most of my views and information. First of the series is a shekhar gupta's, one of my favorites among the current league of journos.
CMs from north, south, east and west of the country are embracing markets and corporate investment. They have sensed the new mood
Who needs checks & balances? Up & down in down southNow, don’t lose the plotLong live our dead ghosts
Two events on the same day this week, in the two most distant metros in the country, each involving an adversarial brother and a fraternal adversary, raised the same, intriguing, vital and delicious question. Was it pro-rich, or pro-aam admi?
In Mumbai Prime Minister Manmohan Singh laid the foundation stone of the new metro, its builder-to-be, Anil Ambani, proudly by his side. Forget the politico-corporate significance of the event for a moment. Just ask yourself this simple question: when India’s most respected and successful economic reformer goes ahead to bless a mega commuting infrastructure project to be built by one of its biggest corporates and tells his own party’s government in Mumbai to get its act together, is he batting for the rich, or the poor? For corporate greed, or for the aam admi’s needs? Is he pulling his moral and prime ministerial weight in favour of the long-suffering poor and middle classes in a decaying city, or is he merely blessing another corporate money-making adventure and underlining his alleged neo-liberal obsession?
Now switch to Kolkata, nearly 2,000 km to the east. Here West Bengal Chief Minister Budhadeb Bhattacharjee stands beaming beside a beaming Mukesh Ambani on the 30th anniversary of the Left Front government, publicly thanks him for “taking the trouble” of coming to Kolkata and warmly welcomes his plans to invest Rs 2,000 crore each in agri-retailing and gas pipeline infrastructure. Is not only India’s, but possibly the world’s most popular Communist leader junking his beliefs and succumbing to the charms of the moneybags, or is he taking one more giant step for the welfare of the poorest of poor, the agrarian class of mostly very small land-owners with no marketing clout? Is this the rise of a new commie-corporate cronyism, or is it learning the truth from facts and doing the right thing by his own aam admi? The question becomes even more interesting as he followed this up immediately by amending his state’s Agricultrural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) Act to allow the private sector to buy produce directly from the farmer.
If the answer is the former, that these were both pro-rich, neo-liberal sort of infractions, then it would seem the virus is catching on with the political class. In the same week, Tamil Nadu patriarch Karnunanidhi visited the Infosys and Wipro campuses in neighbouring Tamil Nadu, inspired by his party’s young IT minister at the Centre, Dayanidhi Maran, and in the company of Karnataka Chief Minister H.D. Kumaraswamy in spite of the fact that politically he is part of a rival formation, and there are serious, current issues between their respective states. Again, in the same week, Manmohan Singh was in Bangalore too, laying the foundation stone of the metro there and an elevated highway in the company of the same Kumaraswamy who stabbed his party’s government in the back and now leads a coalition with the BJP.
And forget Manmohan Singh for the moment. He is, after all, no more than a ‘neo-liberal’, pro-American, pro-Zionist dilettante, anti-poor, and so anti-third world he even wants to take India out of that holy grouping by talking of high growth rates. What about the messiah of the poor Dravidian Karunanidhi, who would give his voter everything free, from rice to television sets to, who knows, an air-conditioner each next? And what about the Gowdas, the self-appointed, ‘humble’ champions of the poor farmer? Have they lost their way so completely as to be crowing about building infrastructure in Bangalore while rural Karnataka, particularly its farm sector, is in such ‘distress’?
Run your eye across the map of India and you cannot get away from the contagion. In Orissa BJP’s ally, Navin Patnaik, who also happens to be one of the cleanest and most popular chief ministers in the country, is rolling the red carpet to attract corporate investments from Tata to Jindal, from Iffco to Posco. Has he lost touch with the reality of his state, one of the poorest in India? Once again the same question, is he batting for the moneybags, or his aam admi?
Go north, south, east or west, the same question confronts you. One of the first ideas of the new Left Front government in Kerala, led by the most committed Stalinist since Stalin, is to exclude IT and tourism industries from strikes. India’s most prominent and politically successful Lohiaite, Mulayam Singh Yadav, has allowed a spectacular privatisation of sugar industry in his Uttar Pradesh that is working to the benefit of all, from the farmer, to the industrialist, to his exchequer. The number two Lohiaite, in Bihar, is so keen to attract investment he has appointed N.K. Singh of the NDA’s once-dreaded neo-liberal ‘mafia’ to head his development board. The BJP governments in Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh are building intra-state road networks in public-private partnerships or on BOT basis at break-neck speed. The chief ministers of Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan, Punjab and Haryana are all bending over backwards to attract corporate investment, to build infrastructure, to corporatise agriculture, towards contract farming. Have they all gone mad? Have they all forgotten their politics? Just what the hell is going on?
Well, if they have indeed gone mad, at least the ideologues of the Left, the self-styled champions of the aam admi, assorted povertarians — who love poverty (different from the poor) so much their leitmotif is, “poverty is my birthright, and you shall have it” — should take heart. Because then India must be ripe for an immediate revolution. But no such thing is going to happen. In fact, in spite of all this dark talk of the have-nots versus have-mores, the farmer versus the broker, the corporate versus the destitute, the overall mood in our country is so wonderfully upbeat we are moving on nevertheless. In fact, as one case in point, in none of the states other than Bengal and Kerala, where elections have taken place lately, has the Left’s vote share added even one more percentage point.
So, here is my take on what is going on. A different sort of revolution is sweeping our country. It is sometimes said Manmohan Singh and his key ministers are erring gravely in running a centre-right government while the mood in their coalition, and even their party, is strongly centre-left. But if you forget the ‘mood’ for a moment and survey the entire country, and indeed the rest of the world as well, it is now evident that, whatever your ideology, there is only one way of economic governance. It is to embrace the global markets, be creative and competitive, fight for a larger share of the flowing capital, build better infrastructure, wealth, enterprise, and thereby more jobs and money for welfare schemes. You can call it centre-right if you wish. But if people, from Manmohan Singh to Buddhadeb, to Karunanidhi to Gowda, from Patnaik to Mulayam, from Nitish to Vasundhara and so on, are in their own ways following the same mantra of governance, there must be something right with it. This is the way India has been changing over the past 15 years. Events of this week just seem to have brought so much of the evidence together in such a remarkable manner.
Labels: thoughts
Labels: thoughts
I have been thinking a lot over the reservation/education thing for the past few days and I feel that it is the lack of proper education centers which is the main problem. There isn't any need for quota or stopping anyone if we have surplus avenues for studies. I have jotted down a few points just to think over them.
What I want?
Labels: thoughts
Much has been talked/discussed/written over the inefficient education system of India. I have tried to summarize the major issues with our education system.
Spending on Education: UPA govt promised to increase the spending from 3% of GDP to 6% and slapped us with education cess for that. I have been happily paying the education cess under the impression that it will go directly for the education.. but this year budget shows otherwise.. no substantial increase in the expenditure on education. This has to increase. I can't understand that when so many univs/engg/medical colleges could be opened in late 50's and early 60's (this was one of the worst times India has ever faced.. everyone thought that India was on the brink of collapse and more so after chinese and pak invasion.) then why can't we do it now, when we are at our best. When will India understand that we have to build a knowledge economy and we have to have the surplus of education centers whatever it takes.
Primary Education: Corrupt Officials, bad/no infrastructure, schools with no-roof, mid-day-meals (this is one great effort to lure children to school, but again corruption is there), number of schools per student too low, lack of 'jawahar navodaya' kind of residential schools (jnv's are a great asset to the nation and i feel that India needs many more of them).
Secondary Education: Number of schools too less, too few scholarships. lack of interests in teachers, lack of motivation in students.
Post Secondary/higher education: less number of schools, the proportion of grads in some of the social sciences streams (say ancient history, sociology, psychology, philosophy, geography) is way toooo high than what a country like India needs. Won't it be a good idea to restrict such streams to some good univs only. And may be start some vocational courses (not necessarily engg.. can be para-medical/agriculture) so as to enroll most of our students who aren't into any professional degree courses/research. Also setting up some institutes/incubation centers which can provide help/knowledge/information etc to young entrepreneurs.
I am sure there are many more and it is not at all exhaustive. Please do feel free to comment if u want some more issues to be added up to the list above.
Also, to propose a solution I would need lots of data and also the skill to fruitfully analyse them (which I have no experience in). Infact, last night it came to us (santosh and me) that instead of everyone proposing sketchy/inexact/immature solutions to the problem why can't we have a study done by some professional body(s) (mckinsey etc) and propose solutions which can then be debated. We (includes the bunch of babus/politicians who govern this whole thing) should also be open to the total change in the system. Such a study shouldn't be dearer when compared to our education budget (this yr's budget outlays around 17k crores for the primary education and this is just from the central govt).
Labels: thoughts
I have been going through some of the 'pro-reservationists' writings these days and I found a startling fact(?). It is not the economic-inequality or lack of facilities that they talk about. They want the reservation as a measure to ensure social-justice. 'Anti-reservationists' argue that if 'reservation' has to be there then it should be on economic basis. In other words 'anti-reservationists' are trying to negate the head-start that some gain due to financial capabilities. While, the 'pro-reservationists' are trying to solve a completely different problem, that of social-justice.
So, I feel that the two groups are trying to tackle two different problems. That of economic-inequality and social-injustice.
'Anti-reservationists' might argue that nothing like 'social-injustice' exists. But, let's face it that it does, it does in schools/colleges everywhere, may be not to the extent as it was in our parents' time. Infact, I have myself seen some of those who are today championing the cause of 'anti-reservation' using casteist remarks against their own batchmates. I personally can't condone this act even as a reaction to their getting into iit on quota seat. How many instances are there of a so-called well-educated (say an iitian) marrying a person of backward class? (Compare this with the probability of a inter-caste marriage if no one ever thought of caste.. just a tad less than 1 taking into account the large number of castes that exist in India)
Coming back to the original issue. The two groups are fighting on two different and almost-independent issues. So, why are the two groups opposed to each-other? Why can't they come together and find the solutions for both the problems simultaneously (this is the only way to beat the currupt politicians)?
o May be because 'pro-reservationists' belong mainly to the backward-classes and have a feeling that this 'anti-reservation' agitation is another trick of forward-classes to deprive them of the social-justice. They should try to see the problems described by the other group in their perspective and understand the logic. I can personally assure that it is not 100% crap. They'll be welcomed to join the so-called anti-reservationists group and discuss and formalise the demands to the govt.
o 'anti-reservationists' think that by diluting the merit we would be dragging the country back. These people also need to think as to why has the merit been coming only from the so-called upper-class and why not from the backward-classes? Does it have anything to do with the genes? Obviously no. They too have the potential but it has rarely come out. Won't it be a great idea if we could somehow unlock this great potential of India? There seems to exist an invisible, almost impenetrable divide between the privileged and unprivileged class. Isn't there any way that pull them onto this side of the world, which produces meritorious students. It is all just a food for thought but reservation can be one of the ways (if not the only and certainly not the best.. think of something better and feasible). It may not seem to deliver immediate value please don't forget to look 25-50 yrs ahead. It may be like the R&D spending which delivers in long-term.
Labels: thoughts
This one it to find the answer of the question 'Do reservations of any form serve any purpose? Or are they good for nothing?'
Assumption: To excel one needs a minimum level of self-motivation and determination.
A greedy approach tells me that for the nation to move ahead at good pace we can't give the reins to anyone less than the best. But, i am yet to prove that greedy works in this case.
Let's see what will help the nation in a longer-run. I think that we need to increase this number of 'self motivated' lot (we have very few of them when compared to the total population of India). Most of the population is locked-in the rural/slums/poverty.
Most of us get motivated through our parents/relatives/neighbors or the environment around us. In short, we all have a social network which affects/motivates us. But, there are lot many groups in our country which are completely isolated and their members have no direct link to any well-educated/informed person to get motivated from (I will call this lot the unprivileged lot and others the privileged ones). It is here that I feel that we need to plant some people to generate the motivation. This can be achieved through various measures. It can be outsiders (like teachers/ngo's/social workers) or insiders (someone from the same group who has been uplifted/trained by govt help). These people can serve as mentors to many budding and promising talents and will thereby increase the size of the talent-basket (the basket which caters to iit's/aiims/isro/civil services/politics/judiciary etc).
In my opinion reservation can help in developing some of these mentors. The people from the privileged lot aren't expected to have that kind of feedback effect, as most of the members of this group are well connected and receive feedback from various sources. Being at a certain level an uplifted people from unprivileged lot are certain to have some foresight (far better than what a average person in group has) which can be of immense help to people in their social contact. They may include their own children, relatives, neighbors and many others. Say, for example a shepherd's son gets selected in the local engineering college and becomes a engineer using the reserved seat. He may not prove to be the best student of the college but there is a high probability of him proving to be a good feedback mechanism to the social group he belongs to. There will be a spurt of students aspiring to be him or may be better him.
Seems, this can create a revolution in the village, but there's a catch. If the person doesn't really belong to such an isolated group or if he doesn't have any ties with such isolated social groups, the effects would be minimal. Therefore, we need to identify the groups carefully. Prima-facie it seems that the correlation of the isolation levels with the poverty is very high and it's safe to assume that poor social groups are more likely to be more isolated.
I will continue on this and try to find out various ways to identify groups, their economic levels.
Labels: thoughts
Yesterday, the indian govt decided to go ahead with implementing 27% reservation for other backward classes (obc). It adds to the already existing 22.5% of reserved seats for SC/ST.
Providing these quota/reservation is thought of as a way to improve the condition of masses. But, I don't get the sense to implement them in the elite schools like IIT's/IIM's/AIIMS, the ones which are pioneers and are meant to groom few extraordinary talents. They are the face of India. They are the ones who have the responsibility to hold the flag for India. How can we afford to give it to anybody less than the best? The logic of increasing the seats would be kind of diluting the quality and reduce the talent grooming. (See an article by Prof. M. Balakrishnan).
I am not extremely against reservation on caste lines as long as we are not able to implement some other better parameters. But, we need to keep in mind the motto with which these institutes have been set-up. They are there to groom some promising talents who can achieve something big for the society rather than to provide education to masses. Even the performance of reserved category candidates haven't been very wonderful (See Karan vs Arjun). To accomodate those few who are really talented but couldn't fare well because of some disadvantes we can have small quota but a quota as huge as 50% in iit's/iim's/aiims completely defeats their motto of being there.
I propose to have three to four category of universities (say A, B, C and D). We can have a varying amount of quota in these univ's (say 50% for D, 25% for C, 12.5% for B and 5% for A). This grading would enable A grade univ's to strive for world-class products. Also, as a medium/long term strategy we need to work on three points.
1. Try to evolve a parameter other than based on caste lines (preferably some economic)
2. Push the quota system towards the early stages of education and free the higher education from it eventually. Post-graduate studies should be freed from any kind of quota/reservation from today only.
3. Most important of all we need many more institutions in all the above-mentioned categories.
I don't know if this is all but this is what i currently think and i am ever-ready for discourse/debate and even ready for change of thought. Do drop by some suggestions or any link to any article/book you feel i need to go through.
Labels: thoughts